OP13. EVALUATING OUTCOMES IN POLYMYALGIA RHEUMATICA: PATIENT-REPORTED, PHYSICIAN-REPORTED OR CLINICAL MEASURES?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
In recent years, there has been an increased focus on placing patients at the center of health care research and evaluating clinical care in order to improve their experience and ensure that research is both robust and of maximum value for the use of medicinal products, therapy, or health services. This paper provides an overview of patients' involvement in clinical research and service evaluat...
متن کاملPatient-Reported Outcomes, Patient-Reported Information
Internet communication is developing. Social networking sites enable patients to publish and receive communications very easily. Many stakeholders, including patients, are using these media to find new ways to make sense of diseases, to find and discuss treatments, and to give support to patients and their caregivers. We argue for a new definition of patient-reported information (PRI), which di...
متن کاملAdvances in Patient-Reported Outcomes: The NIH PROMIS® Measures
Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are questionnaire measures of patients' symptoms, functioning, and health-related quality of life. They are designed to provide important clinical information that generally cannot be captured with objective medical testing. In 2004, the National Institutes of Health launched a research initiative to improve the clinical research enterprise by developing state-of...
متن کاملPatient-reported Outcomes
Key points Many gastrointestinal diseases are symptomdriven, so the patient’s perspective is particularly important in this area. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide essential information that objective measures and clinician assessment may fail to capture. PROs can be measured in a scientific, reliable, and valid manner. Generic, disease-specific and treatmentspecific PRO instruments exis...
متن کاملPatient reported outcomes and patient empowerment in clinical genetics services.
Evaluation of clinical genetics services (CGS), including genetic counseling and genetic testing, has been problematic. Patient mortality and morbidity are unlikely to be directly improved by interventions offered in CGS. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are not routinely measured in CGS evaluation, but this may change as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) become a key part of how health...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Rheumatology
سال: 2005
ISSN: 1462-0332,1462-0324
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh738